Social Networking Service and Depression: Evidence from China

Hao-Jian Dui1, *
1 School of Labor and Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Zhangjia lukou, Hua Xiang, Fengtai District, Beijing, China

Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 93
Abstract HTML Views: 17
PDF Downloads: 0
Total Views/Downloads: 110
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 75
Abstract HTML Views: 15
PDF Downloads: 0
Total Views/Downloads: 90

Creative Commons License
© 2020 Hao-Jian Dui.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the School of Labor and Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, No.121 Zhangjia lukou, Hua Xiang, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China; Tel: +86 18612183883; E-mail:



The rapid development of Social Networking Service (SNS) all over the world has changed everyone's life, of course, China is no exception. At the same time, the possible depression caused by SNS has attracted the attention of academia, but there is little research on the impact of age heterogeneity, especially in China.


The aim of this study was to further explore the effects of SNS and some factors on depression and to find the differences in these relationships between different age groups.


Based on the data of the tracking interview of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2018 (N= 8,666), this study analyzed the relationship between SNS and depression in China and considered the heterogeneous influence in different age groups and other factors (gender, living in urban or rural, household registration, income, cognitive ability, years of education, health, relationship status, CPC membership, religion, social status, popularity). The theoretical basis of age stages is from Erikson’s Eight Stages of Development.


(1) The multiple regression analysis revealed that the depression was positively correlated with SNS dependence, on the whole. However, this effect was not always significant in every age group, and it was most positive at the ages of 16-18. (2) The depression was negatively correlated with health and popularity at all levels of age. (3) The depression appeared obviously gender difference, and it was intensifying by increasing age. (4) For the whole sample, the effects of income, cognitive ability, relationship status and social status on depression were significant, however, the situation was different for each individual age group in this article. (5) The mitigate of religious beliefs on depression was significant only at ages 41-65, and the coefficient was unstable. (6) The effects of years of education, living in urban or rural, household registration, CPC membership on depression were not significant in this study.


The impact of SNS on depression was more significant among young people, especially adolescents. A bad situation of health or popularity could increase the risk of depression. Females were more prone to depression. There were different influences of income, cognitive ability, social status, relationship status and religion on depression in different age groups.

Keywords: China, Social networking service, Depression, Heterogeneity in age, Health, Social status.


In the past two decades, from SixDegrees (which is one of the first social networking websites established in 1997 [1]) to Facebook, we are all the witnesses of the booming development of Social Networking Service (SNS). There were 2.41 billion monthly active users on Facebook, as of June 30, 2019 [2], it was about one-third of the population of the world [3]. In China, the most popular SNS was WeChat which had 1.11 billion active users, as of July 31, 2019 [4]. Recently, however, many researchers found that SNS has brought not only great convenience to our lives but also some problems, such as privacy [5, 6], addiction [7, 8], cyberbullying [9, 10] and mental health [11, 12]. Depression is one of these issues, and it was thought to cause many hazards, such as the risk of suicide and the decline of quality of life [13, 14]. This study focuses on the effect of SNS on depression.

1.1. Literature Review

Published studies on the relationship between SNS and depression have a sundry conclusion. Thomée et al. found that there was a positive relationship between internet communications and symptoms of depression [15]. Wang et al. reported that the time and frequency of SNS use could increase the level of negative emotion and depression [16]. McDougall et al. found that the hours of SNS use per day was associated with depression [17]. Moreover, there are many other studies that indicate that SNS could increase the risk of depression [18-21]. Some articles hold that this effect possibly from the changes in self-esteem, the decrease in physical activity [22], the sense of self-inferiority caused by envy [23], the feeling of “time wasted” by doing something meaningless using SNS [24], the sense of loss owing to the lack of attention [25] and the feeling of information overload [26].

Other studies, however, expressed different opinions. Morgan and Cotten found that the hours of using Internet communication was negatively associated with depressive symptoms [27]. Shaw and Gant argued that chatting with another person online could decrease loneliness and depression significantly [28], and Bessière et al. found that communication with friends and family was negatively correlated with depression [29]. Tandoc et al. found that the effect of Facebook on depression is mediated by Facebook envy, when Facebook envy is controlled for, Facebook use has a negative effect on depression actually [30], and Yan et al. reported that SNS use can reduce the depression level of adolescents significantly, but online social capital could mediate this effect completely [31]. Moreover, some studies hold that there was no significant relationship between SNS and depression [32, 33].

In addition, there are some factors that could affect the relationship between SNS and depression. Some authors indicated that young age could increase the risk of mental problems when people use the internet [34, 35], and SNS use was significantly negatively correlated with depression for older men [36]. Moreover, gender [37], rural-urban [38], income [39], cognitive ability [40], education [41], health [42], relationship status [43], religion [44], social status [45], popularity [46] were considered the influence factors of depressive symptoms. Furthermore, household registration and CPC membership are important demographic variables in China [47], and some studies found that CPC members have a higher sense of happiness [48, 49].

Overall, the relationship between SNS and depression is complex. Although so many studies have been carried out, there were still some limitations. For example, most of the previous studies only focused on unique platform such as Facebook [32, 50], Instagram [51], and the age groups of interviewees were limited [52, 53], or considered the age factor, but no the heterogeneous and the nonlinear analysis [34]. Moreover, there is as yet no research using a large, nationally representative sample of different age groups of China. Compared with previous research, this study aimed to examine a broader range relationship between SNS and depression, and considered about the heterogeneous and the nonlinear factors of age, furthermore, found the effects of SNS and some control variables on depression in different age groups.


2.1. Data

This study uses data from the tracking interview of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2018 (CFPS 2018). CFPS is a national representative longitudinal survey, using the implicit stratification, multi-stage sampling and probability proportional to size (PPS) methods, and the data is available for the public. CFPS 2018 selected samples from 31 provinces of China, excepting Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, the original data included 32,669 personal samples and 14,241 family samples. Through the data cleaning and matching, 8,666 samples were used by this study.

2.2. Variables

CES-D (M=13.14, SD=3.53). In CFPS 2018, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to measure the individual depression level. In order to improve the response rate, CFPS 2018 picked 8 questions out of the 20, each of which has four options, corresponding to 1, 2, 3 and 4 points, respectively (APPENDIX). Among them, two questions are reverse scoring. The total score range is 8-32 points. The higher the score, the more serious the depression.

SNS dependence (M=0.68, SD=0.70). This variable is calculated from two questions in CFPS 2018. The first is “How many hours do you normally spend online per week? (0-168 hour(s))”. The second is “How important is social to you when you use the Internet?”, it has five options, from 1 to 5, 1 means very unimportant and 5 means very important. I divided the value of the first question by 7 to get the average daily online time, and divided the second question by 5 as the weight. Via multiplying the average daily online time and the weight, we got the value formed by combining subjective and objective indicators, from 0 to 24. In order to make the variable clearer, I divide it by 24, then multiply by 10, to transform it into a variable from 0 to 10, in this way, we got the SNS dependence. The larger the value, the participant was more dependent on SNS.

Household registration. In China, the household registration system as a special method of population management has made numerous important impacts on everyone. For a long time, Chinese people have been divided into 2 categories by household registration system, one is resident with agricultural household registration, the other is resident with non-agricultural household registration. There were great differences in the aspects of medical treatment, education, housing, welfare and others between the two kinds of household registration. Not only that, but the cross-regional labor flow was also difficult, due to the household registration system. Thus, the household registration is used as a control variable in this study, moreover, the samples with agricultural household registration are defined as 0 (n=5526, 63.77%), and the non-agricultural are defined as 1 (n=3140, 36.23%).

Cognitive ability (M=6.06, SD=1.96). CFPS 2018 conducted the word test and math test for interviewees, which every kind of test included 34 questions, and set different starting points of questions based on their educational background. Using the score of these two variables, this study generated a proxy variable of cognitive ability, and limited its value from 0 to 10. The larger the value, the higher the cognitive ability.

Whether or not the interviewee is a member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). As well known, the political system of China is multiparty cooperation and political consultation under the leadership of the CPC, and the number of CPC members has reached 90.594 million, as of December 31, 2018 [54]. In China, the title of CPC member has a special significance, so this study took it as a factor that may affect the depression, and defined CPC member as 1 (n=1028, 11.86%), otherwise, as 0 (n=7638, 88.14%).

Other variables. In addition to the above variables, the following variables are included in the model: gender (1=male (n=4414, 50.93%), 0=female (n=4252, 49.07%)); age (from 16 to 86. M=38.66, SD=13.78); square of age divided by 100 (M=16.84, SD=11.34); urban or rural (1=urban (n=5106, 58.92%), 0=rural (n=3560, 41.08%)); the natural logarithm of family annual income (M=11.24, SD=0.88); years of education (M=10.00, SD=3.80); self-rated health (from 1 to 5, the higher the value, the healthier the interviewee thought himself. M=3.16, SD=1.10); relationship status (1=married or cohabiting (n=6395, 73.79%), 0=otherwise (n=2271, 26.21%)); religion (1=the member of any religion (n=209, 2.41%), 0=otherwise (n=8457, 97.59%)); self-rated social status (from 1 to 5, the higher the value, the higher social status the interviewee thought himself. M=2.99, SD=0.93); self-rated popularity (from 0 to 10, the higher the value, the more popular the interviewee thought himself. M=7.12, SD=1.70).

2.3. Methods

In this study, the mean value, standard deviation, or the percentages of the variables were statistically described. Stata, version 15.1, was used.

Moreover, the effects of SNS dependence and the above-mentioned control variables on depression were analyzed in the whole sample by multiple regression, using the method of ordinary least squares (OLS) (Table 1). For the whole sample, the OLS model this paper used as following Equation (1):

Depression=á0+âSNS+ãX+ì (1)

In the Equation (1), Depression is variable CES-D, SNS is variable SNS dependence, X is a vector of other factors including gender, age, (age^2)/100, urban, household registration, LNincome, cognitive ability, EDUyear, health, relationship status, CPC membership, religion, social status, popularity. á0 is constant term, â and ã are unknown parameters to be estimated.

Furthermore, this study analyzed the effects of SNS dependence and the above-mentioned control variables (excepting the age and the square of age divided by 100) on depression in different age groups, in the same way (Tables 2-5). For different age groups, the OLS model this paper used as following Equation (2):

Depression=á0+âSNS+ãZ+ì (2)

In the Equation (2), the difference from Equation (1) is the Z, it is a vector of factors which contains every factor of X in Equation (1), except the age and the (age^2)/100.


3.1. Multiple Regression Analysis for Variable CES-D

3.1.1. Whole Sample

Table 1 shows the results of multiple regression for the whole sample (Equation 1) using OLS. In general, the CES-D was positively correlated with SNS dependence and age. However, the CES-D was negatively correlated with the square of age divided by 100, it meant that the correlation between CES-D and age was not a single trend of positive or negative, it was closer to inverse U-shape (Fig. 1). Moreover, Table 1 shows that the coefficient of gender variable was negative, it meant that women were more vulnerable to depression. Furthermore, the CES-D was negatively correlated with the natural logarithm of family annual income, cognitive ability, health, social status, and popularity. In addition, people who were married or cohabiting were more likely to have lower levels of CES-D.

Table 1. Multiple regression analysis for variable CES-D.
Variable β SE t P>|t| Sig
SNS dependence 0.147 0.052 2.84 0.005 **
gender -0.396 0.070 -5.64 0.000 ***
age 0.124 0.017 7.39 0.000 ***
(age^2)/100 -0.164 0.019 -8.68 0.000 ***
urban -0.128 0.084 -1.54 0.124 -
household registration -0.156 0.091 -1.71 0.087 -
LNincome -0.333 0.045 -7.47 0.000 ***
cognitive ability -0.206 0.025 -8.17 0.000 ***
EDUyear -0.024 0.013 -1.76 0.078 -
health -0.941 0.034 -27.75 0.000 ***
relationship status -0.787 0.114 -6.92 0.000 ***
CPC membership 0.159 0.115 1.39 0.165 -
religion -0.360 0.226 -1.59 0.111 -
social status -0.282 0.039 -7.22 0.000 ***
popularity -0.220 0.021 -10.33 0.000 ***
Note: Whole sample, N=8,666.
*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.
Fig. (1). The grouping method of age is different from the text, it took 5 years old as a stage, and was divided into: under 21, 21-25, 26-30 … 66-70, over 70 years old.

3.1.2. Different Age Groups

In this study, the theoretical basis of age stages is from Erikson’s Eight Stages of Development. It focuses on psychosocial development, and divided life into eight stages based on the personality development [55], they are infancy (0-1.5 years old); early childhood (1.5-3 years old); pre-school age (3-5 years old); school age (5-12 years old); adolescence (12-18 years old); young adult (18-40 years old); adulthood (40-65 years old); old age (more than 65 years old). As McAdams pointed out, Erikson’s theory is trying to understand and explain the entire human life [56].

Many articles indicated that there was a significant relationship between personality and depression [57], and SNS is the product of social development. Thus, it is more suitable for this article than other theories, such as Freud's Psychosexual Developmental Theory. Owing to the age of samples of the data were from 16 to 86 years old, there were no samples belonging to the four age groups in Erikson’s Eight Stages of Development before 16 years old, the sample was divided into four parts by age, they are 16 to 18 years old, 19 to 40 years old, 41 to 65 years old and 66 to 86 years old.

Tables 2-5 show the results of multiple regression in four age groups (Equation 2) using OLS, respectively. The CES-D was positively correlated with SNS dependence at ages 16-18 and 19-40, moreover, the correlation of the former was more positive, but this effect was insignificant in other age groups. However, the CES-D was negatively correlated with health and popularity at all levels of age, and the effects are close. Meanwhile, females might be more likely to have depression above age 18, and this effect was growing with age. In addition, the CES-D was negatively correlated with the natural logarithm of family annual income, cognitive ability and social status at ages 19-40 and 41-65. Furthermore, at ages 41-65, the effects of income and social status on CES-D was more negative, but the effect of cognitive ability on CES-D was less negative than 19-40. Moreover, the CES-D was negatively correlated with the relationship status at ages 41-65 and 66-86, it meant that a stable partner (married or cohabiting) could reduce the level of depression, and this effect was more significant in the 41-65 age group. Besides, religious beliefs might relieve depression, this effect was significant at ages 41-65.

Table 2. Multiple regression analysis for variable CES-D (Ages 16-18).
Variable β SE t P>|t| Sig
SNS dependence 0.388 0.135 2.86 0.004 **
gender -0.313 0.232 -1.35 0.178 -
urban 0.402 0.274 1.47 0.142 -
household registration -0.339 0.320 -1.06 0.290 -
LNincome 0.086 0.147 0.59 0.557 -
cognitive ability -0.128 0.081 -1.58 0.115 -
EDUyear -0.149 0.081 -1.83 0.068 -
health -0.925 0.129 -7.18 0.000 ***
relationship status 0.572 1.733 0.33 0.741 -
CPC membership -1.342 0.943 -1.42 0.155 -
religion -0.015 0.938 -0.02 0.987 -
social status -0.114 0.129 -0.88 0.378 -
popularity -0.229 0.072 -3.18 0.002 **
Note: N=667.
*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.
Table 3. Multiple regression analysis for variables CES-D (Ages 19-40).
Variable β SE t P>|t| Sig
SNS dependence 0.171 0.068 2.52 0.012 *
gender -0.211 0.097 -2.17 0.030 *
urban -0.130 0.112 -1.16 0.247 -
household registration -0.169 0.125 -1.35 0.177 -
LNincome -0.198 0.064 -3.12 0.002 **
cognitive ability -0.212 0.035 -6.01 0.000 ***
EDUyear -0.008 0.020 -0.38 0.701 -
health -0.949 0.048 -19.77 0.000 ***
relationship status -0.184 0.113 -1.63 0.102 -
CPC membership 0.143 0.168 0.85 0.395 -
religion 0.344 0.358 0.96 0.338 -
social status -0.266 0.057 -4.69 0.000 ***
popularity -0.234 0.031 -7.55 0.000 ***
Note: N=4137.
*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.
Table 4. Multiple regression analysis for variables CES-D (Ages 41-65).
Variable β SE t P>|t| Sig
SNS dependence 0.004 0.103 0.04 0.972 -
gender -0.640 0.118 -5.45 0.000 ***
urban -0.274 0.142 -1.93 0.054 -
household registration -0.169 0.149 -1.14 0.255 -
LNincome -0.555 0.072 -7.70 0.000 ***
cognitive ability -0.167 0.043 -3.88 0.000 ***
EDUyear -0.029 0.022 -1.29 0.198 -
health -0.899 0.052 -17.12 0.000 ***
relationship status -1.538 0.226 -6.81 0.000 ***
CPC membership 0.294 0.174 1.69 0.091 -
religion -0.873 0.328 -2.66 0.008 **
social status -0.337 0.062 -5.47 0.000 ***
popularity -0.209 0.033 -6.33 0.000 ***
Note: N=3600.
*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.
Table 5. Multiple regression analysis for variables CES-D(Ages 66-86).
Variable β SE t P>|t| Sig
SNS dependence 0.154 0.253 0.61 0.544 -
gender -0.864 0.431 -2.00 0.046 *
urban -0.702 0.703 -1.00 0.319 -
household registration -0.647 0.705 -0.92 0.360 -
LNincome -0.051 0.243 -0.21 0.835 -
cognitive ability -0.159 0.157 -1.01 0.314 -
EDUyear -0.027 0.067 -0.40 0.689 -
health -0.972 0.208 -4.67 0.000 ***
relationship status -1.267 0.574 -2.21 0.028 *
CPC membership -0.575 0.456 -1.26 0.208 -
religion -0.864 0.962 -0.90 0.370 -
social status -0.265 0.219 -1.21 0.227 -
popularity -0.277 0.136 -2.04 0.043 *
Note: N=262.
*** p<0.001, ** p<0.01, * p<0.05.


4.1. The Age Heterogeneity Analysis

4.1.1. SNS and Depression

The results of this study showed that the CES-D was positively correlated with SNS dependence in the whole sample, but when we consider the heterogeneity in different age groups, this effect was not significant always, it was most positive at the ages 16-18. In addition to the factors mentioned in the introduction [22-25], the heterogeneous effects of SNS dependence on CES-D in different age groups could be explained by such reasons as follows:

First, the middle-age is a stable period of human psychology, before this, young people are more likely to have fluctuations in psychology, and many mental illnesses emerged during adolescence [58]. As the research has shown that adult personality trait development is continuous through at least age 50 [59]. Moreover, personality was considered a significant factor influencing depression, and this influence could work through a variety of pathways [57].

Second, owing to the various types of things from home and work, the middle-age always has more possible factors that may influence the mood [60] and have less time to use SNS Fig. (1), compared to the younger and older people. Thus, the effect of SNS might be weaker for the middle-age.

Third, considering to the obstructions which limit seniors’ SNS use, such as worry about the privacy and security of internet, impairments or disabilities of vision and memory, lack of computer literacy [61, 62], the author presumed that they may prefer to use the simple functions like communication, rather than the advanced actions such as upvote and comment, it might be a factor attenuated the impact of SNS on depression.

4.1.2. Other Variables and Depression

First, the effect of health and popularity on depression seems stable at all the age groups in this study. Alpass and Neville found that self-reported health was associated with depression, the poorer the health, the more serious the depression, but there was not a significant relationship between long-term disability/illness and depression [42]. Thus, the effect of health on depression might from self-feeling, rather than a realistic situation. Nangle et al. indicated that popularity was significantly correlated with friendship, and friendship influenced depression via loneliness [46].

Second, depression appeared obviously gender difference, and it was intensifying by increasing age. For a long time, many studies found that women are about twice as likely as men to get depression [63, 64]. Numerous scholars indicated sundry reasons of this difference, Hyde et al. proposed the ABC model, explained the gender difference from the affective, biological, cognitive factors, respectively, and indicated that adolescence is an important period for this difference [65] Salk et al. indicated that the peak of gender difference appears in adolescence [66], their conclusion is different from this study, that might cause by the difference of culture, society or nation [67], as the research based on the Chinese data from Zhou et al. also found that the prevalence differs between women and men was increased with age [39].

Third, for the whole sample, the effects of income, cognitive ability, relationship status and social status on depression were significant, however, the situation was different for each individual age group in this article. In fact, there are many studies about the relationships between the four of them and depression [39, 40, 68], as for the age heterogeneity, Schaakxs et al. indicated that the effects of income and relationship status on depression were highest in older age [69], and Beaujean et al. indicated that the relationship between depression and cognitive ability develops in the young age (childhood/adolescence) [70]. However, this paper came to the different conclusions, the effects of income, relationship status and social status on depression were most influential at the ages 41-65, for the cognitive ability, it was at ages 19-40. According to Brockmann, the happiness of middle-aged person mostly from the job and marriage [71], they have a direct impact on income, relationship status and social status, thus, this can be regarded as the evidence of the results of this article. Many authors found that cognitive ability could predict job performance [72, 73], in the author's view, this feeling of work smoothly might make the mood better and reduce depression.

Fourth, the mitigation of religious beliefs on depression was significant only at ages 41-65, and the coefficient was unstable. Koenig indicated that most of the studies found that religious beliefs could reduce the risk of depressive symptoms [74]. However, Brown and Tierney got a contradictory result in China, they found that the religiously-active men got the lower happiness, and they attributed this result to the history of China, such as the Cultural Revolution [75], moreover, Li et al. thought that the phenomenon was the result of the prevalence of Confucianism in China [76]. The result of this study could be regarded as new evidence for related research, this might mean the Chinese people's attitude towards religion was undergoing changes.

Fifth, the effects of years of education, living in urban or rural, household registration, CPC membership on depression were not significant in this study. However, many studies found that education could reduce depression [39, 68], Mirowsky and Ross indicated that education could increase the possibility of employment and marriage, the income, the marital relations, and reduces the depression [77]. In fact, some authors found that the place of residence [78], household registration [79, 80], CPC membership [80] have similar effects with education in China. Thus, the effects of the four of them might work through income, social status and relationship status, and this could the reason why they were not significant.

Overall, as pointed out above, this paper has contributed to the study of the relationship between SNS and depression, explored the effects of some factors on depression, and analyzed the heterogeneous effects of age, through empirical analysis and comparison with previous research. Based on the conclusions of this article, for SNS users, they can adjust the usage style according to their own conditions, for a better psychological state. Moreover, for the SNS developers, they can adjust the operation mode and content for different user groups, for the better user experience and health. For example, considering that adolescents are the most affected by SNS, depression warnings can be given to this age group of users.


Despite the strengths, there were still several limitations in this study. Initially, there are huge differences between every social networking site or application, even in the same one, the users would get the disparate information. What's more, everyone’s character is different, it could be the influence factor between SNS and depression. Finally, the surrounding elements of historical, cultural, and natural environments might be one kind of impact. Moreover, the influence mechanisms of the control variables mentioned above on depression were still not completely clear. Therefore, the follow-up researches need more meticulous consideration in these aspects.


In conclusion, this study showed that SNS dependence has a positive effect on depression, and analyzed this positive effect of the heterogeneity in age. In addition, this study found the effects of health and popularity on depression seem stable at all the age; there was a gender difference of depression, and it was intensifying by increasing age; the effects of income, cognitive ability, relationship status, social status and religious beliefs on depression were different between different age groups. Nowadays, with the popularity of social networks, these analyses have great significance. They can help people not only use SNS more reasonably but also relieve the symptoms of depression.


Not applicable.


No animals/humans were directly involved in this research.


Not applicable.


This study uses data from the tracking interview of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2018 (CFPS 2018). CFPS is implemented by the Institute of Social Science Survey (ISSS) at Peking University. According to the requirements of ISSS, an institution or individual can apply for the data on




The author declares no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.


Declared none.


CES-D Questionnaire

The following are some feelings or behaviors you may have. Please indicate the frequency of various feelings or behaviors in the past week according to your actual situation.

Q1-Q8 share the following options: 1. Hardly (less than one day) 2. Sometimes (1-2 days) 3. Often (3-4 days) 4. Most of the time (5-7 days).

Q1. I was upset.

Q2. I thought that it was very difficult to do anything.

Q3. I was not sleeping well.

Q4. I was happy.

Q5. I was lonely.

Q6. I lived a happy life.

Q7. I was sad.

Q8. I cannot continue my life.


[1] Wikipedia. .com
[2] Facebook Newsroom Company Info https://newsroom.fb .com/company-info/
[3] Population Matters. CURRENT WORLD POPULATION.. https://population
[4] Clement J. Most famous social network sites 2019.https://www.sta
[5] Ravichandran R, Benisch M, Kelley PG, et al. Capturing social networking privacy preferences. International Symposium on Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium 2009; 1-18.
[6] Madden M, Lenhart A, Cortesi S, et al. Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Research Center 2013; 21: 2-86.
[7] Aziz N, Wal A, Wal P, Bhalla R. internet addiction in india: Its current prevalence and psychological and complementary treatment techniques. Cur Psy Res and Rev 2020; 16: 1.
[8] Throuvala MA, Griffiths MD, Rennoldson M, Kuss DJ. School-based prevention for adolescent Internet addiction: Prevention is the key. A systematic literature review. Curr Neuropharmacol 2019; 17(6): 507-25.
[9] Gansner M, Belfort E, Leahy C, et al. An assessment of digital media-related admissions in psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 9(3): 220-31.
[10] Whittaker E, Kowalski RM. Cyberbullying via social media. J Sch Violence 2015; 14(1): 11-29.
[11] Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 9(5): 584-90.
[12] Pantic I. Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2014; 17(10): 652-7.
[13] Edmund C. Levin. Adolescent Depression Screening: Not So Fast. Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 9: 1.
[14] Athira KV, Bandopadhyay S, Samudrala PK, Naidu VGM, Lahkar M, Chakravarty S. An overview of the heterogeneity of major depressive disorder: current knowledge and future prospective. Curr Neuropharmacol 2020; 18(3): 168-87.
[15] Thomée S, Eklöf M, Gustafsson E, et al. Prevalence of perceived stress, symptoms of depression and sleep disturbances in relation to information and communication technology (ICT) use among young adults–an explorative prospective study. Comput Human Behav 2007; 23(3): 1300-21.
[16] Chenyu W, Qian X, Ziwei C. Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis of Social Networking Services on the College Students’ Emotions, Depression and Self-esteem. China Journal of Health Psychology 2015; 2: 24.
[17] McDougall MA, Walsh M, Wattier K, et al. The effect of social networking sites on the relationship between perceived social support and depression. Psychiatry Res 2016; 246: 223-9.
[18] Lauckner C, Hill M, Ingram L A. An exploratory study of the relationship between social technology use and depression among college students 2018.
[19] Nishida T, Tamura H, Sakakibara H. The association of smartphone use and depression in Japanese adolescents. Psychiatry Res 2019; 273: 523-7.
[20] Yoon S, Kleinman M, Mertz J, Brannick M. Is social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook-depression relations. J Affect Disord 2019; 248: 65-72.
[21] Griffiths MD, Hussain Z. The associations between problematic social networking site use and sleep quality, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, anxiety and stress. Int J Ment Health Addict 2019.
[22] Pantic I, Damjanovic A, Todorovic J, et al. Association between online social networking and depression in high school students: behavioral physiology viewpoint. Psychiatr Danub 2012; 24(1): 90-3.
[23] Vogel EA, Rose JP, Roberts LR, et al. Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychol Pop Media Cult 2014; 3(4): 206.
[24] Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A, et al. Association between social media use and depression among US young adults. Depress Anxiety 2016; 33(4): 323-31.
[25] Donnelly E, Kuss DJ. Depression among users of social networking sites (SNSs): The role of SNS addiction and increased usage. J Addict Prev Med 2016; 1(2): 107.
[26] Matthes J, Karsay K, Stevic A, et al. “Too Much To Handle” Impact of Mobile Social Networking Sites on Information Overload, Depressive Symptoms, and Well-being. Comput Human Behav 2019.
[27] Morgan C, Cotten SR. The relationship between internet activities and depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003; 6(2): 133-42.
[28] Shaw LH, Gant LM. In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. Internet Res 2004; 28(3)
[29] Bessière K, Pressman S, Kiesler S, Kraut R. Effects of internet use on health and depression: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12(1)e6
[30] Tandoc EC Jr, Ferrucci P, Duffy M. Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing? Comput Human Behav 2015; 43: 139-46.
[31] Jing-Lei Y, Li WU, Meng S, et al. The effect of social network sites use on adolescent depression: The mediating role of online social capital. Chin J Clin Psychol 2016.
[32] Koc M, Gulyagci S. Facebook addiction among Turkish college students: the role of psychological health, demographic, and usage characteristics. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2013; 16(4): 279-84.
[33] Jelenchick LA, Eickhoff JC, Moreno MA. “Facebook depression?” social networking site use and depression in older adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52(1): 128-30.
[34] Schou Andreassen C, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, et al. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav 2016; 30(2): 252-62.
[35] Van Deursen AJ A M, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, et al. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Comput Human Behav 2015; 45: 411-20.
[36] Jeon GS, Choi KW, Jang KS. Social networking site usage and its impact on depressive symptoms among older men and women in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(8): 2670.
[37] Nolen-Hoeksema S. Gender differences in depression. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2001; 10(5): 173-6.
[38] Probst JC, Laditka SB, Moore CG, Harun N, Powell MP, Baxley EG. Rural-urban differences in depression prevalence: Implications for family medicine. Fam Med 2006; 38(9): 653-60.
[39] Zhou X, Bi B, Zheng L, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for depression symptoms in a rural Chinese sample population. PLoS One 2014; 9(6)e99692
[40] Weeks M, Wild TC, Ploubidis GB, et al. Childhood cognitive ability and its relationship with anxiety and depression in adolescence. J Affect Disord 2014; 152-154: 139-45.
[41] Bauldry S. Variation in the protective effect of higher education against depression. Soc Ment Health 2015; 5(2): 145-61.
[42] Alpass FM, Neville S. Loneliness, health and depression in older males. Aging Ment Health 2003; 7(3): 212-6.
[43] Scarinci IC, Beech BM, Naumann W, Kovach KW, Pugh L, Fapohunda B. Depression, socioeconomic status, age, and marital status in black women: a national study. Ethn Dis 2002; 12(3): 421-8.
[44] McCullough ME, Larson DB. Religion and depression: A review of the literature. Twin Res 1999; 2(2): 126-36.
[45] Freeman A, Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, et al. The role of socio-economic status in depression: results from the COURAGE (aging survey in Europe). BMC Public Health 2016; 16(1): 1098.
[46] Nangle DW, Erdley CA, Newman JE, Mason CA, Carpenter EM. Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2003; 32(4): 546-55.
[47] Junqiang L, Moulin X, Yang S. National happiness at a time of economic growth: A tracking study based on CGSS data. Soc Sci China 2013; 34(4): 20-37.
[48] Liu JQ, Yang XMS. National Sense of Happiness in the Economic Growth Period: A Study Based on CGSS Data. Soc Sci China 2012; 12: 82-102.
[49] Lu YP, Wang JP, Wang PC. The happiness effect of identity: Based on the empirical evidence of party members. Econ Perspect 2016; 9: 29-40.
[50] Faelens L, Hoorelbeke K, Fried E, et al. Negative influences of Facebook use through the lens of network analysis. Comput Human Behav 2019; 96: 13-22.
[51] Andalibi N, Ozturk P, Forte A. Sensitive Self-disclosures, Responses, and Social Support on Instagram: the case of# depression. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing 2017; 1485-500.
[52] Wilson K, Fornasier S, White KM. Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2010; 13(2): 173-7.
[53] Blomfield Neira CJ, Barber BL. Social networking site use: Linked to adolescents’ social self‐concept, self‐esteem, and depressed mood. Aust J Psychol 2014; 66(1): 56-64.
[54] Sheng RW. The total number of Communist Party of China exceeds 90 million
[55] Erikson EH. Childhood and society 1993.
[56] McAdams DP. The psychology of life stories. Rev Gen Psychol 2001; 5(2): 100-22.
[57] Klein DN, Kotov R, Bufferd SJ. Personality and depression: explanatory models and review of the evidence. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011; 7: 269-95.
[58] Moukaddam N, Onigu-Otite E, Tucci V. Critical Issues in Adolescent Mental Health in the Emergency Department: Looking Beyond Triage and Risk Assessment. Adolesc Psychiatry 2019; 9(2): 67-8.
[59] Roberts BW, Walton KE, Viechtbauer W. Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull 2006; 132(1): 1-25.
[60] Aldwin CM, Levenson MR. Stress, coping, and health at mid-life 2001; 188-214.
[61] Lewis S, Ariyachandra T. Seniors and online social network use. Conference on Information Systems Applied Research 2010.
[62] Arfaa J, Wang YK. A usability study on elder adults utilizing social networking sites. International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability 2014; 50-61.
[63] Weissman MM, Klerman GL. Sex differences and the epidemiology of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1977; 34(1): 98-111.
[64] Bromet E, Andrade LH, Hwang I, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Med 2011; 9(1): 90.
[65] Hyde JS, Mezulis AH, Abramson LY. The ABCs of depression: integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychol Rev 2008; 115(2): 291-313.
[66] Salk RH, Hyde JS, Abramson LY. Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychol Bull 2017; 143(8): 783-822.
[67] Chentsova-Dutton YE, Ryder AG, Tsai J, et al. Handbook of Depression 2015; 337-54.
[68] Andrade L, Caraveo-Anduaga JJ, Berglund P, et al. The epidemiology of major depressive episodes: results from the International Consortium of Psychiatric Epidemiology (ICPE) Surveys. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003; 12(1): 3-21.
[69] Schaakxs R, Comijs HC, van der Mast RC, Schoevers RA, Beekman ATF, Penninx BWJH. Risk factors for depression: differential across age? Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017; 25(9): 966-77.
[70] Beaujean AA, Parker S, Qiu X. The relationship between cognitive ability and depression: A longitudinal data analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48(12): 1983-92.
[71] Brockmann H. Why are middle-aged people so depressed? Evidence from West Germany. Soc Indic Res 2010; 97(1): 23-42.
[72] Schmitt N. Personality and cognitive ability as predictors of effective performance at work. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 2014; 1(1): 45-65.
[73] Kuncel NR, Rose M, Ejiogu K, et al. Cognitive ability and socio-economic status relations with job performance. Intelligence 2014; 46: 203-8.
[74] Koenig H G. Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN psychiatry 2012; 2012
[75] Brown PH, Tierney B. Religion and subjective well-being among the elderly in China. J Socio-Economics 2009; 38(2): 310-9.
[76] Li T, Shi Y, Chen B. Homeownership and happiness: Theory and evidence from China. Econ Res J 2011; 9: 69-82.
[77] Mirowsky J, Ross CE. Age and depression. J Health Soc Behav 1992; 33(3): 187-205.
[78] Chen Y, Fan X. Discordance between subjective and objective social status in contemporary China. Journal of Chinese Sociology 2015; 2(1): 14.
[79] Wu X, Zhuoni Z. Household registration, occupational segregation and income inequality in urban China. Soc Sci China 2014; 222(6): 118-40.
[80] Qiu LP, Xiao RK. Cultural capital and status attainment: An empirical study based in Shanghai. Chinese Social Science 2011; 6: 121-35.