RESEARCH ARTICLE


Melody and Language: An Examination of the Relationship Between Complementary Processes



Victoria L. Harms, Colleen Cochran, Lorin J. Elias*
Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Canada


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
7
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1666
Abstract HTML Views: 1929
PDF Downloads: 1435
Total Views/Downloads: 5030
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 815
Abstract HTML Views: 1120
PDF Downloads: 1031
Total Views/Downloads: 2966



Creative Commons License
© 2014 Harms et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5A5, Canada; Tel: 306-966-6657; Fax: 306-966-6630; E-mail: lorin.elias@usask.ca


Abstract

It is well accepted that the left and right hemispheres of the brain typically play separate and distinct roles in cognitive processing. Extensive research examining the lateralization of music and language processes has provided a clear and consistent demonstration of this division of processing across the cerebral hemispheres. However, in spite of this line of research examining population-level lateralization of these processes, little focus has been placed on examining the relationship between the two processes. Do these two processes share a common developmental origin that influences their pattern of lateralization, or do independent processes govern their lateralization? In this study we examined the relationship pattern in degree of lateralization between linguistic processing and melody recognition using dichotic-listening tasks. The expected right ear advantage was observed for the linguistic processing task. Additionally, the expected left ear advantage was not observed for the melody recognition task, precluding an informative assessment of complementarity between the two tasks. A positive correlation between the laterality scores on the two tasks suggests a shared processing network for linguistic and melodic processing.

Keywords: Lateralization, complementarity, language, music, melody recognition.