RESEARCH ARTICLE


Mapping the Lonely Landscape - Assessing Loneliness and Its Consequences



Niina Junttila1, 2, *, Sakari Kainulainen3, Juho Saari4
1 Turku Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Turku, Finland
2 Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, Finland
3 Diaconia University of Applied Sciences, Finland
2 Kuopio Welfare Research Centre, University of Eastern Finland, Finland


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
5
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1029
Abstract HTML Views: 1575
PDF Downloads: 497
Total Views/Downloads: 3101
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 523
Abstract HTML Views: 900
PDF Downloads: 366
Total Views/Downloads: 1789



Creative Commons License
© 2015 Junttila et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Teacher Education, University of Turku, FIN-20014 University of Turku, Finland. E-mail: niina.junttila@utu.fi


Abstract

The subjective nature of loneliness poses challenges for valid and reliable assessment methods - what should we ask when we want to evaluate one´s loneliness? Therefore, this study aimed to compare loneliness assessed by different indicators: frequency of loneliness over the last year, number of good friends, satisfaction with existing social relationships, and the short version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. These indicators were used to study the gender and age-related differences between lonely and non-lonely adults and as predictors for the self-reported consequences of loneliness. The sample consisted of 17,258 Finnish adults aged 30 to 60 years. Based on our results, the number of good friends had less power as an indicator for the self-reported negative consequences of loneliness than did the other indicators (i.e., satisfaction with existing personal relationships and resultant [based on confirmatory factor analysis] social and emotional loneliness factors of the UCLA Loneliness Scale). The importance of identifying loneliness in the prevention of psychosocial and economic issues, substance abuse and eating disorders, and negative consequences on health is discussed. More broadly, based on our results, we find that there is a legitimate reason to consider loneliness as a form of social inequality.

Keywords: Indicators, loneliness, measurement validity, negative consequences, UCLA loneliness scale.